首页> 外文OA文献 >The fee tendering and service quality issue revisited
【2h】

The fee tendering and service quality issue revisited

机译:再次讨论了招标和服务质量问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose - It is a little over twenty years since mandatory fee scales were abolished by UK professional bodies. During this period fee levels have fluctuated with economic demand, and new procurement strategies such as partnering have been developed, but there is still a widespread view in industry, that fee levels are too low. This view is shared by many professionals, and perhaps more surprisingly by clients, even in the current construction and property boom. The research reported in this paper investigates the link between competitive fee tendering and clients’ perceptions of service quality in the UK Property Industry. The main hypothesis is that there is a causal relationship between service quality and the method of appointment of the professional. Design/methodology/approach - The research involved unstructured interviews with clients and professionals and a postal questionnaire study of one hundred and thirty three UK based clients. The questionnaire study was a repeat of a similar survey conducted eight years previously in very different economic conditions. The public and private sector clients each assessed the service quality received from a professional using a measurement scale developed from the generic service industry instrument SERVQUAL. The scale is used to test the main hypothesis and four sub-hypotheses. There were twice as many private sector clients completing the questionnaires as there were public sector clients and the largest group of professionals assessed were General Practice Chartered Surveyors. Findings - The results of the recent study are similar to the earlier one (in that evidence of the predicted relationship is not provided by the data) but there are some interesting differences in the results of both studies – fee tendering has declined in popularity, direct appointment has increased, but less than 5% of the commissions were let on a partnered basis. Practical implications – Property managers and other professionals m
机译:目的-自英国专业机构废除了强制性收费标准以来,已有二十多年的历史。在此期间,费用水平随经济需求而波动,并且已经开发了诸如合作伙伴关系之类的新采购策略,但是在业界仍然普遍认为费用水平太低。即使在当前的建筑和房地产热潮中,这种观点也被许多专业人士,甚至更令人惊讶的是,客户都认同。本文报道的研究调查了英国房地产业中竞争性收费与客户对服务质量的看法之间的联系。主要假设是服务质量与专业人员的任命方法之间存在因果关系。设计/方法/方法-该研究涉及对客户和专业人员的非结构化访谈,以及对133个英国客户的邮政问卷调查。问卷调查是八年前在非常不同的经济条件下进行的类似调查的重复。公共和私营部门的客户分别使用通用服务行业工具SERVQUAL制定的衡量标准评估了从专业人员那里获得的服务质量。该量表用于检验主要假设和四个子假设。完成问卷调查的私营部门客户是公共部门客户的两倍,而接受评估的专业人士最多的是通用执业特许测量师。调查结果-最近的研究结果与早期的研究结果相似(数据未提供预测关系的证据),但两项研究的结果都有一些有趣的差异-费用招标的受欢迎程度有所下降,直接任命有所增加,但只有不到5%的佣金是以合伙形式出租的。实际意义–物业经理和其他专业人员

著录项

  • 作者

    Hoxley, M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号